In case you couldn’t get in on the PS3 Beta for Bad Company 2 and your PC will barely run Windows 3.1, you won’t have to wait until March to get your hands on Bad Company 2. EA and DICE confirmed a console demo will be released before the game ships, but no further information was revealed.
While the game is shaping up to be damn good, we’ve had some internal debate here at Loot Ninja on whether it can compete with Modern Warfare 2 on both consoles and PC. I think yes, some others think no. So let’s get you to weigh in on the issue. Do you think Bad Company 2 can be as good as or better than Modern Warfare 2 in the multiplayer realm?
Twisted Gamer Radio RSS Feed
Uh…what you Ninjas smoking? MW2 has nothing on BFBC2…..bfbc2 has destructable environments, vehicles, huge maps, awesome weapons, much better graphics, the list goes on an on.
you are right there great game cant wait to get my hands on bad company 2 on my xbox
the maps are mutch bigger
i was very disapointed with mw that i didnt even buy the mw2
MW2 vs BC2…..
The best thing about BC2 that MW2 does not have is team work, i hate how in MW2 there is no coordination, its a free for all, everyone just wants to run and get as many kills as they can. BC2 is based on points from killing, fixing armor, healing as a medic and much more.
MW2 gets very repetitive after a few hours of game play not like BC2 where every battle never plays the same, all buildings are destructible =). I realy like the rush mode on the PS3 Beta for BC2 where the front line moves as you complete the objectives. I also like how there is a lot of space to work with and never limited to a small map like the ones in MW2.
MW2 in overall is a great game the Graphics are Awesome better than BC2.
BC2 is better in team work game play and you wont feel like no one has you back. To me BC2 feels more like a real soldier where you and your team will play different rolls to win the game.
In MW2 you dont need to be careful about picking your roll just go out there and kill, capture flags, and plant bombs but its not that great when u get killed every 10 seconds and theres people everywhere.
MW2 a 9/10 in visuals, 4/10 in team work, overal 7/10
BC2 a 7.5/10 in visuals, 9/10 in team work, overal 8.5/10
The thing that realy makes BC2 better than MW2 is the complete destruction of everything and team work, Just like life battle. At the start of the battle the map is all nice and at the end its all destroyed (a complete mess) u realy get down and dirty in this game.
Dont forget all the vihicles you can drive; jeeps, tanks, helicopters, uav thats right an unmanned aerial vehicle and much more.
Hope you guys get to try both games, both fun but very different.
Thanks
Carlos
I think both games are great I already have Mw2, and have enjoyed the multiplaye 100 times, and Bc2 just looks amazing graphically, audio/sound (destruction) and gameplay.
I think the games have more differences than similarities; Bc2 has huge multiplayer maps with destructible environments
I think the tactical knife will be the only thing I’ll miss from MW2. It’s fun running around stabbing people =) Throwing knives are cool too.
what a stupid post… lol sorry, its just kind of dumb “confirming” a demo is coming out for bfbc2, cause its just so apparent. anyway.. bfbc2 totally blows away mw2. its not even arguable anymore. i prefer watching VIDEOS of bfbc2 than playing mw2… its such a shit game after i got tired of playing.. which was surprisingly fast.
lol no mw2 is the best and always will be the best. bc2 can go queef
I have to say that BFBC2 is shaping up to blow MW2 out of the water, the only thing that could mess this up is the servers. EA never handles the servers well and lag is normally a big problem with them. I think that is why they are putting so much effert into the betas and demos because bfbc1 had serious lag issues at first.
I like pie