<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: VMware Fusion 2 vs. Parallels 4 &#8211; FIGHT!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://loot-ninja.com/2008/11/25/vmware-fusion-2-vs-parallels-4-fight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://loot-ninja.com/2008/11/25/vmware-fusion-2-vs-parallels-4-fight/</link>
	<description>Guard your jewels... we&#039;re coming for em</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:33:03 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bo Zhong</title>
		<link>http://loot-ninja.com/2008/11/25/vmware-fusion-2-vs-parallels-4-fight/comment-page-1/#comment-53449</link>
		<dc:creator>Bo Zhong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 14:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loot-ninja.com/?p=12247#comment-53449</guid>
		<description>Thanks very much for this review. Having tried both fusion and parallels 3 and 4, for basic stuff like excel, word, plus some unique stuff [updating using a usb device for datacards], speed is not noticeable between the two [maybe fusion is a bit faster]. However, usb connectivity is *much* better with fusion, always seems to be a problem with parallels. BUT what makes fusion *much better* is customer support–parallels customer support is non-existent! You have to purchase each upgrade, and pay *again* if you malware or whatever crashes your machine and you need to download the program again. As well, it appears they care nothing on customer service: several emails to support went totally unanswered.
So performance-wise, advantage to fusion for basic tasks, particularly if you use usb peripherals; with respect to customer service, parallels gets an F.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks very much for this review. Having tried both fusion and parallels 3 and 4, for basic stuff like excel, word, plus some unique stuff [updating using a usb device for datacards], speed is not noticeable between the two [maybe fusion is a bit faster]. However, usb connectivity is *much* better with fusion, always seems to be a problem with parallels. BUT what makes fusion *much better* is customer support–parallels customer support is non-existent! You have to purchase each upgrade, and pay *again* if you malware or whatever crashes your machine and you need to download the program again. As well, it appears they care nothing on customer service: several emails to support went totally unanswered.<br />
So performance-wise, advantage to fusion for basic tasks, particularly if you use usb peripherals; with respect to customer service, parallels gets an F.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OmerTech</title>
		<link>http://loot-ninja.com/2008/11/25/vmware-fusion-2-vs-parallels-4-fight/comment-page-1/#comment-42329</link>
		<dc:creator>OmerTech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 14:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loot-ninja.com/?p=12247#comment-42329</guid>
		<description>Until last year, I used Parrallels. As soon as I heard about Vmware, I installed it. All because the Unity Mode. Now also cause I can run Linux.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Until last year, I used Parrallels. As soon as I heard about Vmware, I installed it. All because the Unity Mode. Now also cause I can run Linux.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler Tschida</title>
		<link>http://loot-ninja.com/2008/11/25/vmware-fusion-2-vs-parallels-4-fight/comment-page-1/#comment-40039</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler Tschida</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 22:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loot-ninja.com/?p=12247#comment-40039</guid>
		<description>Very informative.  I have to keep Windows away from my Macbook, I don&#039;t want to hurt it&#039;s feelings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very informative.  I have to keep Windows away from my Macbook, I don&#8217;t want to hurt it&#8217;s feelings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Odie</title>
		<link>http://loot-ninja.com/2008/11/25/vmware-fusion-2-vs-parallels-4-fight/comment-page-1/#comment-40038</link>
		<dc:creator>Odie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 22:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loot-ninja.com/?p=12247#comment-40038</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve used Parallels in the past and moved away from it as it had notable performance issues with high CPU tasks ( which apparently recovery software does ) and because I moved to 64-bit version of Vista.  Which, neither company support Vista Home Premium x64.  Before that, my XP installation became toast when I tried to install SP3 and didn&#039;t know I had to update Parallels before I did.  ...Good article, though, nice stuff to know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve used Parallels in the past and moved away from it as it had notable performance issues with high CPU tasks ( which apparently recovery software does ) and because I moved to 64-bit version of Vista.  Which, neither company support Vista Home Premium x64.  Before that, my XP installation became toast when I tried to install SP3 and didn&#8217;t know I had to update Parallels before I did.  &#8230;Good article, though, nice stuff to know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Fisher</title>
		<link>http://loot-ninja.com/2008/11/25/vmware-fusion-2-vs-parallels-4-fight/comment-page-1/#comment-40031</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Fisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 19:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loot-ninja.com/?p=12247#comment-40031</guid>
		<description>I use Fusion, but I have to say my experience with 3d graphics under it have shown it be lacking. The only game I&#039;ve tried so far runs as smooth as glass on my new MacBook when I use Boot Camp, but stutters badly under Fusion.

Luckily, most of my use is not gaming.

I have no reason to think Parallels would be any better (and suspect it&#039;d be worse).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Fusion, but I have to say my experience with 3d graphics under it have shown it be lacking. The only game I&#8217;ve tried so far runs as smooth as glass on my new MacBook when I use Boot Camp, but stutters badly under Fusion.</p>
<p>Luckily, most of my use is not gaming.</p>
<p>I have no reason to think Parallels would be any better (and suspect it&#8217;d be worse).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
