<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Sony SHOULD Charge for the PSN</title>
	<atom:link href="http://loot-ninja.com/2008/11/11/why-sony-should-charge-for-the-psn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://loot-ninja.com/2008/11/11/why-sony-should-charge-for-the-psn/</link>
	<description>Guard your jewels... we&#039;re coming for em</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:33:03 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sam33</title>
		<link>http://loot-ninja.com/2008/11/11/why-sony-should-charge-for-the-psn/comment-page-1/#comment-41544</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam33</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loot-ninja.com/?p=11435#comment-41544</guid>
		<description>You guys act like Xbox Live is $500 dollars a year or something....I mean for god sakes its only $40 a year what you can&#039;t afford $3.33 a month?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys act like Xbox Live is $500 dollars a year or something&#8230;.I mean for god sakes its only $40 a year what you can&#8217;t afford $3.33 a month?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: will</title>
		<link>http://loot-ninja.com/2008/11/11/why-sony-should-charge-for-the-psn/comment-page-1/#comment-39488</link>
		<dc:creator>will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 01:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loot-ninja.com/?p=11435#comment-39488</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry but thats the stupidest thing i&#039;ve ever heard. Personally i&#039;ve gotten so many people to switch from XBOX360 to ps3 soully on the free online gaming. It is a factor in choice for buyers. Pay for online, or don&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry but thats the stupidest thing i&#8217;ve ever heard. Personally i&#8217;ve gotten so many people to switch from XBOX360 to ps3 soully on the free online gaming. It is a factor in choice for buyers. Pay for online, or don&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry</title>
		<link>http://loot-ninja.com/2008/11/11/why-sony-should-charge-for-the-psn/comment-page-1/#comment-39476</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 21:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loot-ninja.com/?p=11435#comment-39476</guid>
		<description>If Sony starts charging for online play, the developers lose, as well as sony, and my wife wins.  I will stop buying games and therefore game developers will stop making the games.  I will spend less time gaming and more time outside with my wife.  I wont need the best LCD or PLASMA tv made by sony, so I wont go out and buy one.  

Sony dont be greedy! Jeff dont be a tool!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Sony starts charging for online play, the developers lose, as well as sony, and my wife wins.  I will stop buying games and therefore game developers will stop making the games.  I will spend less time gaming and more time outside with my wife.  I wont need the best LCD or PLASMA tv made by sony, so I wont go out and buy one.  </p>
<p>Sony dont be greedy! Jeff dont be a tool!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nostars</title>
		<link>http://loot-ninja.com/2008/11/11/why-sony-should-charge-for-the-psn/comment-page-1/#comment-39453</link>
		<dc:creator>nostars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 15:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loot-ninja.com/?p=11435#comment-39453</guid>
		<description>One should never confuse a pay service to mean better service.  

Sony&#039;s free online service is fine to me.  Sure I would like more things out of it, but does that mean I would be willing to pay for it AND Xbox Live?  No.

Many times, companies just pocket this additional money they receive from charging us to access what should be a free service.  We paid for the console, we paid for the game, we pay electricity, we pay for internet, and now we have to pay to play the game we already paid for?  

If the online fee covered DLC, I would understand, but the reality is that it does not and will not.  We will still be gouged for DLC that should have been included with the game on day one.  I hate to see a game come out, and then two weeks later read announcements about upcoming DLC in the following weeks.  That means the DLC already existed and they chose to serve us an incomplete game to just take more money from us. Yoda/Vader ($5) in SC IV is a perfect example.

Hell, I still pay for Live and I don&#039;t even use it.  If Sony tries to charge for their service, I&#039;ll cancel Live as well and stick to NO ONLINE SERVICE.  Because for me, the reality is I have no idea what I am getting out of Live that I &quot;need&quot;.  The only reason I have not canceled it after all these years is that I was one of the beta testers for Live.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One should never confuse a pay service to mean better service.  </p>
<p>Sony&#8217;s free online service is fine to me.  Sure I would like more things out of it, but does that mean I would be willing to pay for it AND Xbox Live?  No.</p>
<p>Many times, companies just pocket this additional money they receive from charging us to access what should be a free service.  We paid for the console, we paid for the game, we pay electricity, we pay for internet, and now we have to pay to play the game we already paid for?  </p>
<p>If the online fee covered DLC, I would understand, but the reality is that it does not and will not.  We will still be gouged for DLC that should have been included with the game on day one.  I hate to see a game come out, and then two weeks later read announcements about upcoming DLC in the following weeks.  That means the DLC already existed and they chose to serve us an incomplete game to just take more money from us. Yoda/Vader ($5) in SC IV is a perfect example.</p>
<p>Hell, I still pay for Live and I don&#8217;t even use it.  If Sony tries to charge for their service, I&#8217;ll cancel Live as well and stick to NO ONLINE SERVICE.  Because for me, the reality is I have no idea what I am getting out of Live that I &#8220;need&#8221;.  The only reason I have not canceled it after all these years is that I was one of the beta testers for Live.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reasons why Sony should charge for PSN: Are you serious - PS3 Daily</title>
		<link>http://loot-ninja.com/2008/11/11/why-sony-should-charge-for-the-psn/comment-page-1/#comment-39447</link>
		<dc:creator>Reasons why Sony should charge for PSN: Are you serious - PS3 Daily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 09:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loot-ninja.com/?p=11435#comment-39447</guid>
		<description>[...] Loot Ninja’s title says “Why Sony SHOULD Charge for the PSN”, now give the some credit because they did say they were not rich, nor do they work for Sony, nor do they want to pay full stop for PSN or Xbox Live, but here is what they say anyway. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Loot Ninja’s title says “Why Sony SHOULD Charge for the PSN”, now give the some credit because they did say they were not rich, nor do they work for Sony, nor do they want to pay full stop for PSN or Xbox Live, but here is what they say anyway. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dadeisvenm</title>
		<link>http://loot-ninja.com/2008/11/11/why-sony-should-charge-for-the-psn/comment-page-1/#comment-39442</link>
		<dc:creator>dadeisvenm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 03:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loot-ninja.com/?p=11435#comment-39442</guid>
		<description>1)  Your ASSUMPTION &quot;paid service = savings&quot; is a contradiction. How does a person who pays for breakfast better off than a person who gets a comparable breakfast for free? That&#039;s like saying a paid for copy of &quot;public domain&quot; material is better then getting it for free. 

2) Paid for services brings about better online gaming? Hmmm.. I guess Valve and the like to START charging. PC gamers have been getting and continue to get FAAAAARRRR better service for online gaming then console gamers. Xbox LIVE 1st gen. was a fee to activate the NIC card. Thats like paying a monthly charge for breathing.  but hay... you pay to breath, be my guest.

3) There are models where paid services work well WITH free services. Some MMORPGs have figured this out. A balance will work when these service provider offer a PREMIUM tier of service. 

XBL free
------

15 Player Friends list
Peer-to-Peer gaming
Advertisement infused Dashboard
Base community options

XBL Premium 
___________

50 Player Friends list
Peer-to-Peer w/ packet optimization and Microsoft housed private servers
Advertisement free Dashboard and freebies
Premium community options




Sony is already offering excellent FREE service comparable in in some cases better then XBL. 

I.E. ... WarHawk
Peer-to-Peer and Standalone Servers
PSN Chat with (6)multiple user access 
and with Playstation Home  developer designed Home spaces like the Warkhawk room, the players can put coordinate better, plan better, execute better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1)  Your ASSUMPTION &#8220;paid service = savings&#8221; is a contradiction. How does a person who pays for breakfast better off than a person who gets a comparable breakfast for free? That&#8217;s like saying a paid for copy of &#8220;public domain&#8221; material is better then getting it for free. </p>
<p>2) Paid for services brings about better online gaming? Hmmm.. I guess Valve and the like to START charging. PC gamers have been getting and continue to get FAAAAARRRR better service for online gaming then console gamers. Xbox LIVE 1st gen. was a fee to activate the NIC card. Thats like paying a monthly charge for breathing.  but hay&#8230; you pay to breath, be my guest.</p>
<p>3) There are models where paid services work well WITH free services. Some MMORPGs have figured this out. A balance will work when these service provider offer a PREMIUM tier of service. </p>
<p>XBL free<br />
&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>15 Player Friends list<br />
Peer-to-Peer gaming<br />
Advertisement infused Dashboard<br />
Base community options</p>
<p>XBL Premium<br />
___________</p>
<p>50 Player Friends list<br />
Peer-to-Peer w/ packet optimization and Microsoft housed private servers<br />
Advertisement free Dashboard and freebies<br />
Premium community options</p>
<p>Sony is already offering excellent FREE service comparable in in some cases better then XBL. </p>
<p>I.E. &#8230; WarHawk<br />
Peer-to-Peer and Standalone Servers<br />
PSN Chat with (6)multiple user access<br />
and with Playstation Home  developer designed Home spaces like the Warkhawk room, the players can put coordinate better, plan better, execute better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wolf26pack</title>
		<link>http://loot-ninja.com/2008/11/11/why-sony-should-charge-for-the-psn/comment-page-1/#comment-39440</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolf26pack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 02:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loot-ninja.com/?p=11435#comment-39440</guid>
		<description>I also would not pay for the PSN if they started to charge a fee for it. Like many have said above there are far to many things that we have to pay for such as...

- Game System (One time fee)
- Game (One time fee)
- Internet (Monthly fee)
- Electricity (Monthly fee)

and in these struggling economic times. We consumers can&#039;t handle anymore fee&#039;s.

I can see where this poster is coming from though. If you were to buy a lot of MMO&#039;s and instead of paying a per game model on these you pay one fee. The thing to me though is if I start an MMO I would really like to make sure it&#039;s a good one before I bought it and I just can&#039;t see myself or many others going crazy with the MMO&#039;s and buying more then one. Also remember that MMO&#039;s have DLC just in big chunks and they call those expansion packs. Speaking of DLC...

The other thing you mention about getting the DLC given to us instead of charging us for it. While a nice thought, it would never happen, Like you said their a Business they will charge you for anything and everything. Trust me leave the free things alone. Now I am reading about how they are going to start to create alternate endings to games and try to charge for those. THAT IS RIDICULOS!!! Sony just started to charge for Premium themes like Microsoft which really sucks but at least Sony still provides free ones alongside the Premium ones and allows users to create their own.

Now also you have remember one thing Sony is trying to get a lot of User Created content on their system espically with the game that just came out called LittleBigPlanet. If users had to pay to play online that would significantly cut the User Generated content down.

I really think Sony is doing the right thing by keeping the PSN free. I really hope Sony doesn&#039;t get greedy and start charging for the PSN because they will only be shooting themselves in the foot. I mean what better way to get great content then from your fellow creative gamers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also would not pay for the PSN if they started to charge a fee for it. Like many have said above there are far to many things that we have to pay for such as&#8230;</p>
<p>- Game System (One time fee)<br />
- Game (One time fee)<br />
- Internet (Monthly fee)<br />
- Electricity (Monthly fee)</p>
<p>and in these struggling economic times. We consumers can&#8217;t handle anymore fee&#8217;s.</p>
<p>I can see where this poster is coming from though. If you were to buy a lot of MMO&#8217;s and instead of paying a per game model on these you pay one fee. The thing to me though is if I start an MMO I would really like to make sure it&#8217;s a good one before I bought it and I just can&#8217;t see myself or many others going crazy with the MMO&#8217;s and buying more then one. Also remember that MMO&#8217;s have DLC just in big chunks and they call those expansion packs. Speaking of DLC&#8230;</p>
<p>The other thing you mention about getting the DLC given to us instead of charging us for it. While a nice thought, it would never happen, Like you said their a Business they will charge you for anything and everything. Trust me leave the free things alone. Now I am reading about how they are going to start to create alternate endings to games and try to charge for those. THAT IS RIDICULOS!!! Sony just started to charge for Premium themes like Microsoft which really sucks but at least Sony still provides free ones alongside the Premium ones and allows users to create their own.</p>
<p>Now also you have remember one thing Sony is trying to get a lot of User Created content on their system espically with the game that just came out called LittleBigPlanet. If users had to pay to play online that would significantly cut the User Generated content down.</p>
<p>I really think Sony is doing the right thing by keeping the PSN free. I really hope Sony doesn&#8217;t get greedy and start charging for the PSN because they will only be shooting themselves in the foot. I mean what better way to get great content then from your fellow creative gamers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CB</title>
		<link>http://loot-ninja.com/2008/11/11/why-sony-should-charge-for-the-psn/comment-page-1/#comment-39438</link>
		<dc:creator>CB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 01:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loot-ninja.com/?p=11435#comment-39438</guid>
		<description>Yes, you are crazy.

I pay my ISP, I paid for the PS3, I paid for the damn game, I pay for the electricity... 

I shouldn&#039;t have to pay more to play the fucking game I already paid for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, you are crazy.</p>
<p>I pay my ISP, I paid for the PS3, I paid for the damn game, I pay for the electricity&#8230; </p>
<p>I shouldn&#8217;t have to pay more to play the fucking game I already paid for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ldubbz</title>
		<link>http://loot-ninja.com/2008/11/11/why-sony-should-charge-for-the-psn/comment-page-1/#comment-39431</link>
		<dc:creator>Ldubbz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:58:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loot-ninja.com/?p=11435#comment-39431</guid>
		<description>@ TruBlue

Thats not quite correct about playing games downloaded from LIVE.  What you are actually referring to is when a 360 HDD is placed on a DIFFERENT 360 console than the one on which said content was purchased.  That happens because the DRM info is saved on the actual console.  Having you sign-in when on a different console is MS&#039; way of knowing you are OK to play the content.  If you are playing on your 360 that you purchased the content on, you dont need an internet connection whatsoever, but you DO have to sign-in to your profile locally (not online, just on your 360)

Sorry for the boring and long-winded response, just want peoples to be clear about that one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ TruBlue</p>
<p>Thats not quite correct about playing games downloaded from LIVE.  What you are actually referring to is when a 360 HDD is placed on a DIFFERENT 360 console than the one on which said content was purchased.  That happens because the DRM info is saved on the actual console.  Having you sign-in when on a different console is MS&#8217; way of knowing you are OK to play the content.  If you are playing on your 360 that you purchased the content on, you dont need an internet connection whatsoever, but you DO have to sign-in to your profile locally (not online, just on your 360)</p>
<p>Sorry for the boring and long-winded response, just want peoples to be clear about that one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lia</title>
		<link>http://loot-ninja.com/2008/11/11/why-sony-should-charge-for-the-psn/comment-page-1/#comment-39428</link>
		<dc:creator>lia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loot-ninja.com/?p=11435#comment-39428</guid>
		<description>The biggest advantage Sony has over the competition is that PSN is free. If they were to start charging, I would not pay period. You are not a developer and you don&#039;t work for Sony and yet you&#039;re suggesting they charge for a service that they made free in the first place. Why should a person pay for games, then pay for the system, and THEN pay for online as well when they have other priorities? 

Even if I bought a 360 first, there is no way in HELL I&#039;d pay for online service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The biggest advantage Sony has over the competition is that PSN is free. If they were to start charging, I would not pay period. You are not a developer and you don&#8217;t work for Sony and yet you&#8217;re suggesting they charge for a service that they made free in the first place. Why should a person pay for games, then pay for the system, and THEN pay for online as well when they have other priorities? </p>
<p>Even if I bought a 360 first, there is no way in HELL I&#8217;d pay for online service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
