Ubisoft’s RB6: Vegas 2 should be a great addition to the already storied franchise. The first game was outstanding but now has the bar set by COD4 for multiplayer. As long as the single player lives up and the Co-op continues to develop, this should be a borderline must have.
-
Podcast
-
Top Commentators
- Mixb
- nostars
- Odie
- EHT
- Techgirl
7 Comments
Write a Comment»How much of a change has the game underwent since the first one was out? I don’t see much of a change in visuals. Then again. video is too small to tell.
not much of a difference Suki
I had R6V for 360 and not much of an improvement, I read the AI is better and some new features but not much IMO
so that means 2 million to be sold world wide. Sounds good to me.
It looks good, and since I skipped RSV, I may get this one.
I actually wasn’t to impressed with RB6: Vegas. It didn’t feel like Rainbow Six to me. I didn’t like 4 either. I liked the original, and Rogue Spear and Raven Shield. But 4 was horrible, and Vegas felt wierd for a Rainbow Six game. And 1 question. Why are we going back to Vegas? I already beat that game and saved it once, why do I have to save Vegas again.
Because Vegas has Wayne Newton,and…and…and Carrot Top…Wait, why ARE we supposed to save Vegas?
I dunno I wish they would make them more like the old ones again. I find that cover system to be over used now, like WWII shooters.