<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sony Planning to Dump Backwards Compatibility</title>
	<atom:link href="http://loot-ninja.com/2007/10/08/sony-planning-to-dump-backwards-compatibility/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://loot-ninja.com/2007/10/08/sony-planning-to-dump-backwards-compatibility/</link>
	<description>Guard your jewels... we&#039;re coming for em</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:33:03 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Game Hard</title>
		<link>http://loot-ninja.com/2007/10/08/sony-planning-to-dump-backwards-compatibility/comment-page-1/#comment-17369</link>
		<dc:creator>Game Hard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 03:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loot-ninja.com/2007/10/08/sony-planning-to-dump-backwards-compatibility/#comment-17369</guid>
		<description>COME ON SONY!  common sense, you don&#039;t get rid of the BC for the system before the one you are currently working on.  Maybe they like ruining their system and then just lowering its HD size and price and see if people will buy it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>COME ON SONY!  common sense, you don&#8217;t get rid of the BC for the system before the one you are currently working on.  Maybe they like ruining their system and then just lowering its HD size and price and see if people will buy it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://loot-ninja.com/2007/10/08/sony-planning-to-dump-backwards-compatibility/comment-page-1/#comment-17260</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 22:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loot-ninja.com/2007/10/08/sony-planning-to-dump-backwards-compatibility/#comment-17260</guid>
		<description>I just hate how Sony handles everything these days. And I really, really hate them for causing GTAIV to be pushed back. I hope now that its pushed back, that Rock* will add more to the 360 version. That would be amazing! =]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just hate how Sony handles everything these days. And I really, really hate them for causing GTAIV to be pushed back. I hope now that its pushed back, that Rock* will add more to the 360 version. That would be amazing! =]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drunk pandas</title>
		<link>http://loot-ninja.com/2007/10/08/sony-planning-to-dump-backwards-compatibility/comment-page-1/#comment-17249</link>
		<dc:creator>drunk pandas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 16:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loot-ninja.com/2007/10/08/sony-planning-to-dump-backwards-compatibility/#comment-17249</guid>
		<description>@Dave - I think the biggest problem is that Sony already made it clear they&#039;re dumping the 60GB version in Europe and will only sell the 40GB version. That means that anyone wanting to get a PS3 in the comings months may not have any opportunity for BC. If they were keeping a higher SKU on the market, I would say okay. But being the only option, it&#039;s a bad move.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dave &#8211; I think the biggest problem is that Sony already made it clear they&#8217;re dumping the 60GB version in Europe and will only sell the 40GB version. That means that anyone wanting to get a PS3 in the comings months may not have any opportunity for BC. If they were keeping a higher SKU on the market, I would say okay. But being the only option, it&#8217;s a bad move.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://loot-ninja.com/2007/10/08/sony-planning-to-dump-backwards-compatibility/comment-page-1/#comment-17248</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 16:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loot-ninja.com/2007/10/08/sony-planning-to-dump-backwards-compatibility/#comment-17248</guid>
		<description>Actually,  It looks doubtful that they could go back and add software compatibility for a couple of reasons.

1) The &quot;software&quot; based BC was evidently not 100% software.  It still had the graphics chip from the PS2 (no I am not referring to the Emotion Engine).
2) The &quot;software&quot; BC wasn&#039;t very good anyway.  Many if not most games have issues, even though they may be playable.  So, people haven&#039;t really been happy with it.

I believe the move makes sense from a business standpoint.  If they had left in the BC (which only partially worked).  Then there would be little reason for people to buy the 80GB at $200 more.  I mean 40GB, Motorstorm, memory card slots, and 2 USB ports are hardly worth $200.  So you need to give people a reason to buy the other models least they be sitting on the shelves (which I still think will happen).

So, really if BC is so very important to those who do not have a PS3, then buy one so you get it.  Otherwise you&#039;ll have to keep your PS2.

Personally, I bought a 60GB US model because of the EE engine and near 100% BC, because I wanted that.  And I would recommend anyone to do the same who wants BC and doesn&#039;t want to keep around the PS2.

Heck on Ebay a few months ago I sold my PS2 (which worked perfectly) and the controllers for $100.  I put that towards the newly priced 60GB and am very happy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually,  It looks doubtful that they could go back and add software compatibility for a couple of reasons.</p>
<p>1) The &#8220;software&#8221; based BC was evidently not 100% software.  It still had the graphics chip from the PS2 (no I am not referring to the Emotion Engine).<br />
2) The &#8220;software&#8221; BC wasn&#8217;t very good anyway.  Many if not most games have issues, even though they may be playable.  So, people haven&#8217;t really been happy with it.</p>
<p>I believe the move makes sense from a business standpoint.  If they had left in the BC (which only partially worked).  Then there would be little reason for people to buy the 80GB at $200 more.  I mean 40GB, Motorstorm, memory card slots, and 2 USB ports are hardly worth $200.  So you need to give people a reason to buy the other models least they be sitting on the shelves (which I still think will happen).</p>
<p>So, really if BC is so very important to those who do not have a PS3, then buy one so you get it.  Otherwise you&#8217;ll have to keep your PS2.</p>
<p>Personally, I bought a 60GB US model because of the EE engine and near 100% BC, because I wanted that.  And I would recommend anyone to do the same who wants BC and doesn&#8217;t want to keep around the PS2.</p>
<p>Heck on Ebay a few months ago I sold my PS2 (which worked perfectly) and the controllers for $100.  I put that towards the newly priced 60GB and am very happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sty</title>
		<link>http://loot-ninja.com/2007/10/08/sony-planning-to-dump-backwards-compatibility/comment-page-1/#comment-17246</link>
		<dc:creator>Sty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 15:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loot-ninja.com/2007/10/08/sony-planning-to-dump-backwards-compatibility/#comment-17246</guid>
		<description>Not cool, but i have 60Gb... And i love playing ps2 titles ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not cool, but i have 60Gb&#8230; And i love playing ps2 titles &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
