Comments on: The rage of being a PS3 owner http://loot-ninja.com/2007/09/27/the-rage-of-being-a-ps3-owner/ Guard your jewels... we're coming for em Wed, 03 Dec 2008 07:57:59 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5 By: Makidian http://loot-ninja.com/2007/09/27/the-rage-of-being-a-ps3-owner/#comment-16752 Makidian Tue, 02 Oct 2007 15:18:28 +0000 http://loot-ninja.com/2007/09/27/the-rage-of-being-a-ps3-owner/#comment-16752 Do you own a PS3? Have you played all the games? If you haven't then you are basing the idea of subpar games on reviews, which isn't something that should be done when discussing the games for a system. I am not making assumptions and I am certainly not bashing the 360 either, nor was I implying that you were bashing the PS3. I am not assuming anything about the RPG state of the 360 if that is what you are refering to, it's a fact look it up. Sakaguchi went on record saying that he will not make games for the PS3 because of Kutaragi. I consider that a loss because if Lost Odyssey or Blue Dragon came out for the PS3 I would get them both. 360 owners are traditionally and spend more money on shooters, the numbers and stats are there. With an installed user base of 11 or so million and all the people clamoring for RPG's then the numbers should show that and Blue Dragon should have no trouble moving a couple million copies but it isn't flying off the shelves and I hate to say it but I doubt that Lost Odyssey will either. It has over twenty hours of cut scene's. I would kill to have a game with twenty hours of cut scenes, but how many 360 owners will? I have bought and played most of the games for the PS3, and while only a handful of them float my boat, how many games do most people keep on hand at any given time? I only have two right now for my PS3 and they are Ninja Gaiden Sigma and Heavenly sword. I traded in Warhawk(not big on multiplayer just wanted the headset, but an overall great game) Lair(beat it twice, not a lot of replay value) and Resistance(beat it so much I couldn't play it anymore). I hated Enchanted Arms but I beat it, and Double Agent was awful, those are the only two bad games I have played and disliked. I bought my PS3 to play action/adventure games and RPG's, and a couple of shooters. I bought my PS3 to wait for Final Fantasy XIII, but that doesn't mean that I am not going to get other games in between(let's face it FFXIII ain't coming out any time soon), and to utilize the features it came with out of the box. I have been regularly replacing DVD collection with Blu-Ray movies and downloading some of the better games that are on the PSN, Super Stardust HD is awesome, and even if it is an older game, I had never played it before. Just because it doesn't have hundreds of games to choose from doesn't mean that there aren't games to be played. The PS3 has been out for almost eleven months so the 360 can only be better than it for that length of time and I have to disagree. I mean how many good games were out during the time the PS3 was not on the market. Five, maybe six games? And even now how many great and almighty games does the 360 have capturing the hearts of millions, maybe ten. So the PS3 has probably five or six must have games since it's been out, with more coming in the next few months. Ratchet will help move systems, Folklore is simply spectacular, Haze for shooter fans, Uncharted looks incredible, and those are just some of the exclusives until the year end. How do you think Christmas will pan out this year? Bet the 360 and PS3 tie for second, and the Wii stays on top. If they release the 40gig PS3 this year, you should get one, owning your own will change your mind about it not being good right now. Do you own a PS3? Have you played all the games? If you haven’t then you are basing the idea of subpar games on reviews, which isn’t something that should be done when discussing the games for a system. I am not making assumptions and I am certainly not bashing the 360 either, nor was I implying that you were bashing the PS3. I am not assuming anything about the RPG state of the 360 if that is what you are refering to, it’s a fact look it up. Sakaguchi went on record saying that he will not make games for the PS3 because of Kutaragi. I consider that a loss because if Lost Odyssey or Blue Dragon came out for the PS3 I would get them both. 360 owners are traditionally and spend more money on shooters, the numbers and stats are there. With an installed user base of 11 or so million and all the people clamoring for RPG’s then the numbers should show that and Blue Dragon should have no trouble moving a couple million copies but it isn’t flying off the shelves and I hate to say it but I doubt that Lost Odyssey will either. It has over twenty hours of cut scene’s. I would kill to have a game with twenty hours of cut scenes, but how many 360 owners will? I have bought and played most of the games for the PS3, and while only a handful of them float my boat, how many games do most people keep on hand at any given time? I only have two right now for my PS3 and they are Ninja Gaiden Sigma and Heavenly sword. I traded in Warhawk(not big on multiplayer just wanted the headset, but an overall great game) Lair(beat it twice, not a lot of replay value) and Resistance(beat it so much I couldn’t play it anymore). I hated Enchanted Arms but I beat it, and Double Agent was awful, those are the only two bad games I have played and disliked. I bought my PS3 to play action/adventure games and RPG’s, and a couple of shooters. I bought my PS3 to wait for Final Fantasy XIII, but that doesn’t mean that I am not going to get other games in between(let’s face it FFXIII ain’t coming out any time soon), and to utilize the features it came with out of the box. I have been regularly replacing DVD collection with Blu-Ray movies and downloading some of the better games that are on the PSN, Super Stardust HD is awesome, and even if it is an older game, I had never played it before. Just because it doesn’t have hundreds of games to choose from doesn’t mean that there aren’t games to be played. The PS3 has been out for almost eleven months so the 360 can only be better than it for that length of time and I have to disagree. I mean how many good games were out during the time the PS3 was not on the market. Five, maybe six games? And even now how many great and almighty games does the 360 have capturing the hearts of millions, maybe ten. So the PS3 has probably five or six must have games since it’s been out, with more coming in the next few months. Ratchet will help move systems, Folklore is simply spectacular, Haze for shooter fans, Uncharted looks incredible, and those are just some of the exclusives until the year end. How do you think Christmas will pan out this year? Bet the 360 and PS3 tie for second, and the Wii stays on top. If they release the 40gig PS3 this year, you should get one, owning your own will change your mind about it not being good right now.

]]> By: Fragloser http://loot-ninja.com/2007/09/27/the-rage-of-being-a-ps3-owner/#comment-16710 Fragloser Mon, 01 Oct 2007 22:25:47 +0000 http://loot-ninja.com/2007/09/27/the-rage-of-being-a-ps3-owner/#comment-16710 See, the problem with these kind of posts is that you are just assuming things. While I will agree that the PS3 has more potential to be a great system. I didn't want to waste 2 years waiting/buying a console that had subpar games. For me, it was about having a system that I could have fun with right away. PS3 will be good in the future, but 360 has been better for the past 2 years so thats why I went with the 360. I'm not trying to bash the PS3 at all, as I do know that it has a lot more features then the 360 if you buy all the accessories for the 360 and that it is more powerful when utilized fully. We will see, no one can do anything besides make predictions. I'm a 360 owner, and Bungie did a horrible job with Halo 3 by the way. I feel like it really wasn't a good game graphically or anything, they just poorly developed it because they knew it would sell. If Halo 3 was another game, it would have received poor marks. See, the problem with these kind of posts is that you are just assuming things. While I will agree that the PS3 has more potential to be a great system. I didn’t want to waste 2 years waiting/buying a console that had subpar games. For me, it was about having a system that I could have fun with right away.

PS3 will be good in the future, but 360 has been better for the past 2 years so thats why I went with the 360.

I’m not trying to bash the PS3 at all, as I do know that it has a lot more features then the 360 if you buy all the accessories for the 360 and that it is more powerful when utilized fully. We will see, no one can do anything besides make predictions.

I’m a 360 owner, and Bungie did a horrible job with Halo 3 by the way. I feel like it really wasn’t a good game graphically or anything, they just poorly developed it because they knew it would sell. If Halo 3 was another game, it would have received poor marks.

]]> By: Makidian http://loot-ninja.com/2007/09/27/the-rage-of-being-a-ps3-owner/#comment-16665 Makidian Mon, 01 Oct 2007 18:36:24 +0000 http://loot-ninja.com/2007/09/27/the-rage-of-being-a-ps3-owner/#comment-16665 Actually Lost Odyssey is being developed by Mistwalker which was formed by Sakaguchi who no longer works for SE, he left awhile ago. He won't make games for the PS3 because he doesn't/didn't like Ken Kutaragi not because of a system preference. And while Lost Odyssey may be a great game, and I believe it will be, Mistwalker also made Blue Dragon which is an excellent game, but nobody really cares, and it's sales express that. There are 360 owners that will complain all day long about not having RPG's but they don't sell on the 360. Eternal Sonata has gotten high marks and it won't sell much either, but the PS3 is getting it next year with a few more features. It will sell better on the PS3. People can discuss the RAM features of each system as much as they want but it's a moot point. At this point it doesn't really matter. How much of the 360's ful power do you think Halo 3 uses, like 90%, that means that the Xbox 360 is already reaching it's full potential after 2 years of release, and your higher profile games will be using that, Mass Effect for example. The PS3 is probably using 25% for Heavenly Sword and the game is comparable to almost any 360 game released to date. And nobody can say otherwise unless they have played or own the game, which I do, and it's nothing short of spectacular, it's only fault from reviews was that it was too short, and I agree it was, I finished it in six hours. That's Ninja Theories fault though not Sony's. They chose to make a short game, Sony didn't. Lair had beautiful graphics and regardless of what reviews and some people may say the controls were fine save a few minor things. Factor 5 stated they wanted the controls to be organic to simulate the feel of flying a dragon, and if you use the controls in a slow and fluid movement, there is no trouble controlling the dragon. I digress, that was a bit off topic. Sony's online, while not flawless, works just fine for me and everyone I know that has a PS3. Anyone who faults it without having experienced it on more than one occassion, has no basis for argument. The PS2 online may have sucked, I don't know I never tried it, but that has nothing to do with the PS3, it's a different console with different game that offer different experiences. I personally think Live is decent but I have never played on it without being verbally assualted for no reason whatsoever. I think the 360 has great games but crappy hardware. If someone thinks that a multiplatform game is better on the 360 then remember who made the game, Madden isn't good on the PS3 because the devs made it so, Sony nor the PS3 can be faulted when a third party makes a shitty port. If they can't take the time to learn the system than they aren't good at their job and need to find another. The games for the PS3 have started to pick up steam and there is no stopping it now. Oh and Final Fantasy XI sold crap for the 360, so I don't know why anyone should think that XIII will come out for it at all. Actually Lost Odyssey is being developed by Mistwalker which was formed by Sakaguchi who no longer works for SE, he left awhile ago. He won’t make games for the PS3 because he doesn’t/didn’t like Ken Kutaragi not because of a system preference. And while Lost Odyssey may be a great game, and I believe it will be, Mistwalker also made Blue Dragon which is an excellent game, but nobody really cares, and it’s sales express that. There are 360 owners that will complain all day long about not having RPG’s but they don’t sell on the 360. Eternal Sonata has gotten high marks and it won’t sell much either, but the PS3 is getting it next year with a few more features. It will sell better on the PS3. People can discuss the RAM features of each system as much as they want but it’s a moot point. At this point it doesn’t really matter. How much of the 360’s ful power do you think Halo 3 uses, like 90%, that means that the Xbox 360 is already reaching it’s full potential after 2 years of release, and your higher profile games will be using that, Mass Effect for example. The PS3 is probably using 25% for Heavenly Sword and the game is comparable to almost any 360 game released to date. And nobody can say otherwise unless they have played or own the game, which I do, and it’s nothing short of spectacular, it’s only fault from reviews was that it was too short, and I agree it was, I finished it in six hours. That’s Ninja Theories fault though not Sony’s. They chose to make a short game, Sony didn’t. Lair had beautiful graphics and regardless of what reviews and some people may say the controls were fine save a few minor things. Factor 5 stated they wanted the controls to be organic to simulate the feel of flying a dragon, and if you use the controls in a slow and fluid movement, there is no trouble controlling the dragon. I digress, that was a bit off topic. Sony’s online, while not flawless, works just fine for me and everyone I know that has a PS3. Anyone who faults it without having experienced it on more than one occassion, has no basis for argument. The PS2 online may have sucked, I don’t know I never tried it, but that has nothing to do with the PS3, it’s a different console with different game that offer different experiences. I personally think Live is decent but I have never played on it without being verbally assualted for no reason whatsoever. I think the 360 has great games but crappy hardware. If someone thinks that a multiplatform game is better on the 360 then remember who made the game, Madden isn’t good on the PS3 because the devs made it so, Sony nor the PS3 can be faulted when a third party makes a shitty port. If they can’t take the time to learn the system than they aren’t good at their job and need to find another. The games for the PS3 have started to pick up steam and there is no stopping it now. Oh and Final Fantasy XI sold crap for the 360, so I don’t know why anyone should think that XIII will come out for it at all.

]]> By: Fragloser http://loot-ninja.com/2007/09/27/the-rage-of-being-a-ps3-owner/#comment-16623 Fragloser Mon, 01 Oct 2007 00:46:32 +0000 http://loot-ninja.com/2007/09/27/the-rage-of-being-a-ps3-owner/#comment-16623 Okay, I am going to say a few unbiased things here very quickly. While PS3 may be getting FFXIII (Love the FF series), the 360 is going to be getting Lost Odyssey, which is being developed by one of Square Enix's heads that MS hired. I have been reading up a lot on Lost Odyssey, and I feel it will really compete against FF. Now I know that many of you guys are going to complain about the 4 DVD's that it uses. However, we were first introduced to multiple CD's by Sony, and no one seemed to mind at all with FF, since you only change the CD maybe every 10 hours of gameplay, or once in a few days (I do that anyways). "Have you heard about Killzone 2’s levels? Well let me inform you. 2GB PER LEVEL! I REPEAT 2 GB PER LEVEL!!!!!11 Can the xbox360 handle that kind of gaming? No! Cuz their devs. are limited 8GB of developing space! Boooo! Ps3 Pwns!" C'mon Jeffery, the PS3 holds more space which is good, but you have to realize the other side of the story. And its pretty immature to end with "Boooo! Ps3 Pwns!" by the way. Alright, when Xbox 360 devs make their games, they just have to use a better compression format to fit all the information on a DVD. When Dev's develop on the PS3 though, they don't have to use all that compression which makes the game effectively take up more space on the CD. The advantage Blue-Ray has is that it can hold more textures, and also hold more CG sections of games. However, if someone is developing on PS3 and gets lazy, load times get very long because stuff isn't compressed well enough, so it has to scan for more on the DVD. I do agree that PS3 has the advantage though on the Blue-ray. Finally: I believe that most people say Sony servers suck is because the problems that PS2 online had (it was horrible). I know that Sony lost my sale with the PS3 because of that, but now that I read about it, Sony has a comparable online system. I still prefer live though because of the very well integrated friends system. Also: I know this may not sound like a huge difference, but the PS3 uses more RAM for the "dashboard" which removes RAM available for games. Not a huge problem but the 360 uses less. Both consoles have their advantages and disadvantages, and I'm going to leave it at that, no one can say one system is better purely on hardware/software, but just on opinion. Okay, I am going to say a few unbiased things here very quickly.

While PS3 may be getting FFXIII (Love the FF series), the 360 is going to be getting Lost Odyssey, which is being developed by one of Square Enix’s heads that MS hired. I have been reading up a lot on Lost Odyssey, and I feel it will really compete against FF. Now I know that many of you guys are going to complain about the 4 DVD’s that it uses. However, we were first introduced to multiple CD’s by Sony, and no one seemed to mind at all with FF, since you only change the CD maybe every 10 hours of gameplay, or once in a few days (I do that anyways).

“Have you heard about Killzone 2’s levels? Well let me inform you. 2GB PER LEVEL! I REPEAT 2 GB PER LEVEL!!!!!11 Can the xbox360 handle that kind of gaming? No! Cuz their devs. are limited 8GB of developing space! Boooo! Ps3 Pwns!”

C’mon Jeffery, the PS3 holds more space which is good, but you have to realize the other side of the story. And its pretty immature to end with “Boooo! Ps3 Pwns!” by the way. Alright, when Xbox 360 devs make their games, they just have to use a better compression format to fit all the information on a DVD. When Dev’s develop on the PS3 though, they don’t have to use all that compression which makes the game effectively take up more space on the CD. The advantage Blue-Ray has is that it can hold more textures, and also hold more CG sections of games. However, if someone is developing on PS3 and gets lazy, load times get very long because stuff isn’t compressed well enough, so it has to scan for more on the DVD. I do agree that PS3 has the advantage though on the Blue-ray.

Finally: I believe that most people say Sony servers suck is because the problems that PS2 online had (it was horrible). I know that Sony lost my sale with the PS3 because of that, but now that I read about it, Sony has a comparable online system. I still prefer live though because of the very well integrated friends system.

Also: I know this may not sound like a huge difference, but the PS3 uses more RAM for the “dashboard” which removes RAM available for games. Not a huge problem but the 360 uses less.

Both consoles have their advantages and disadvantages, and I’m going to leave it at that, no one can say one system is better purely on hardware/software, but just on opinion.

]]> By: Makidian http://loot-ninja.com/2007/09/27/the-rage-of-being-a-ps3-owner/#comment-16587 Makidian Sun, 30 Sep 2007 00:04:52 +0000 http://loot-ninja.com/2007/09/27/the-rage-of-being-a-ps3-owner/#comment-16587 I don't even understand why you own a PS3 Andrew, if all you do is bash it and praise your 360 then what is the point of owning one? You are sorely misinformed such as most people are that the PS3 is failing, it's been out ten months, and they have met their worldwide shipment target of 5-6mil, so how is it failing? You must be blind if you think that Resistance's graphics are bad, you probably thought Kameo was the best launch game ever for the 360 if you say the RFoM graphics are bad. Why don't you trade in your PS3 for a Wii(if you don't already have one) and then you can be happy with what you have. I mean if you really want to get into it about games you must realize that there have only been maybe a handful of good and worthwhile 360 games that have come out amongst the hundred(estimate) or so games that have come out for the 360. And if you want to say that multiplatform games have been better on the Xbox then you must realize that it's because of the devs not Sony. And Sony can put as many free movies as they want through home because they own movie studios. C'mon do you really know what your talking about or are you just trying to make your point with false and biased information? The Cell processor hasn't been fully utilized because it's a complex thing. The 360 is already running at about 90% percent of it's capabilities, by the time Gears of War 2 comes out it will be running at max. And I hope you like swapping disc because there's gonna be a lot of games coming out that run off two, and your precious graphics will suffer because of that. Killzone 2 has the most complex lighting and shading of any game coming out, better than dare I say Halo 3(which is really good). If you can't find a game for the PS3 whether on disc or the PSN, then you nor anyone else for that matter, should not only not own a PS3, but any system because you can't be pleased. Go ahead and run down a list of games that the 360 has that is going to really give the PS3 a run for it's money because now that Halo 3 is out there won't be many. In fact let me do it: Mass Effect(Looks Great), Gears 2(will be good if they make it longer), Alan Wake(could go multi), Halo Wars(do you play RTS games? How many do you think will?), Bioshock(already out but could go multi, top selling game and Take2 could use the money), Ninja Gaiden 2(Looks awesome but isn't a system seller most people that will buy it already own a 360), Lost Odyssey(Blue Dragon and other RPG's don't move systems this won't either), Infinite Undiscovery(Square kept the rights if it doesn't sell well guess where it will end up). That's all I have for now. I would go through the list of PS3 games but the system sellers are MGS4 and FFXIII and as soon as the demo's come out and release dates are announced you can epect PS3's to sell better because some people have to wait for flagship titles before they buy. The only reason 360 sales have picked up is because of Halo 3, that will fade before Christmas, They missed their target of 12mil for the year end, their first quarter will be good because of Halo 3. Oh and Microsoft is more debt now than Sony, RRoD cost them another billion or were you sleeping during E3, which put them almost 2 billion back in debt(around 1.8 I think). And the PSN and online play have been free for a year and Home has no indication of being a pay service but I would gladly pay for an online experience as robust as Home. And to the person wondering about Stranglehold's delay, I think it was to integrate rumble and not have to fight Halo 3 for day one sales. And I would expect a rumble controller packed into and being sold seperately by the Christmas rolls in regardless of what they said at TGS. I am done with my rant, sorry if it was too long. I don’t even understand why you own a PS3 Andrew, if all you do is bash it and praise your 360 then what is the point of owning one? You are sorely misinformed such as most people are that the PS3 is failing, it’s been out ten months, and they have met their worldwide shipment target of 5-6mil, so how is it failing? You must be blind if you think that Resistance’s graphics are bad, you probably thought Kameo was the best launch game ever for the 360 if you say the RFoM graphics are bad. Why don’t you trade in your PS3 for a Wii(if you don’t already have one) and then you can be happy with what you have.
I mean if you really want to get into it about games you must realize that there have only been maybe a handful of good and worthwhile 360 games that have come out amongst the hundred(estimate) or so games that have come out for the 360. And if you want to say that multiplatform games have been better on the Xbox then you must realize that it’s because of the devs not Sony. And Sony can put as many free movies as they want through home because they own movie studios. C’mon do you really know what your talking about or are you just trying to make your point with false and biased information? The Cell processor hasn’t been fully utilized because it’s a complex thing. The 360 is already running at about 90% percent of it’s capabilities, by the time Gears of War 2 comes out it will be running at max. And I hope you like swapping disc because there’s gonna be a lot of games coming out that run off two, and your precious graphics will suffer because of that. Killzone 2 has the most complex lighting and shading of any game coming out, better than dare I say Halo 3(which is really good). If you can’t find a game for the PS3 whether on disc or the PSN, then you nor anyone else for that matter, should not only not own a PS3, but any system because you can’t be pleased.
Go ahead and run down a list of games that the 360 has that is going to really give the PS3 a run for it’s money because now that Halo 3 is out there won’t be many. In fact let me do it: Mass Effect(Looks Great), Gears 2(will be good if they make it longer), Alan Wake(could go multi), Halo Wars(do you play RTS games? How many do you think will?), Bioshock(already out but could go multi, top selling game and Take2 could use the money), Ninja Gaiden 2(Looks awesome but isn’t a system seller most people that will buy it already own a 360), Lost Odyssey(Blue Dragon and other RPG’s don’t move systems this won’t either), Infinite Undiscovery(Square kept the rights if it doesn’t sell well guess where it will end up). That’s all I have for now. I would go through the list of PS3 games but the system sellers are MGS4 and FFXIII and as soon as the demo’s come out and release dates are announced you can epect PS3’s to sell better because some people have to wait for flagship titles before they buy. The only reason 360 sales have picked up is because of Halo 3, that will fade before Christmas, They missed their target of 12mil for the year end, their first quarter will be good because of Halo 3. Oh and Microsoft is more debt now than Sony, RRoD cost them another billion or were you sleeping during E3, which put them almost 2 billion back in debt(around 1.8 I think). And the PSN and online play have been free for a year and Home has no indication of being a pay service but I would gladly pay for an online experience as robust as Home.
And to the person wondering about Stranglehold’s delay, I think it was to integrate rumble and not have to fight Halo 3 for day one sales. And I would expect a rumble controller packed into and being sold seperately by the Christmas rolls in regardless of what they said at TGS. I am done with my rant, sorry if it was too long.

]]> By: drunk pandas http://loot-ninja.com/2007/09/27/the-rage-of-being-a-ps3-owner/#comment-16560 drunk pandas Fri, 28 Sep 2007 23:40:57 +0000 http://loot-ninja.com/2007/09/27/the-rage-of-being-a-ps3-owner/#comment-16560 @andrew - monthly service charges for Home? I'd love to know where you got that information, because I get mine directly from Sony. Home and the PSN will continue to be free for the life of the PS3. There are no plans to charge for any of it. Any Sony will NOT be charging to videos on Home either. You can buy new clothes and furniture, but you don't pay for videos. As for Resistance, I play on a 50" 1080p set and it looks pretty damn good, definitely better than any of the launch titles from the Xbox 360 (and I did own every single launch title from the 360). @andrew - monthly service charges for Home? I’d love to know where you got that information, because I get mine directly from Sony. Home and the PSN will continue to be free for the life of the PS3. There are no plans to charge for any of it. Any Sony will NOT be charging to videos on Home either. You can buy new clothes and furniture, but you don’t pay for videos.

As for Resistance, I play on a 50″ 1080p set and it looks pretty damn good, definitely better than any of the launch titles from the Xbox 360 (and I did own every single launch title from the 360).

]]> By: Makidian http://loot-ninja.com/2007/09/27/the-rage-of-being-a-ps3-owner/#comment-16546 Makidian Fri, 28 Sep 2007 16:36:57 +0000 http://loot-ninja.com/2007/09/27/the-rage-of-being-a-ps3-owner/#comment-16546 The PSN, or the PS3 for that matter, don't need people like you on it Mr. Andrew. And like everyone else has noticed, I don't think caps locking your entire comment is helping your arguments. I really don't think that you own both systems either because you would know that the graphics of Resistance far outdo anything that was launched with the 360. And you shouldn't try and play Warhawk with a 56k connection, oh that's right you probably can't. And if you can't join a game in five minutes it times out, if it doesn't do that you can join one of the other 18,000 games that are going on during peak hours. Don't be a fool and try to spread fud here , I don't think it will work. The PSN, or the PS3 for that matter, don’t need people like you on it Mr. Andrew. And like everyone else has noticed, I don’t think caps locking your entire comment is helping your arguments. I really don’t think that you own both systems either because you would know that the graphics of Resistance far outdo anything that was launched with the 360. And you shouldn’t try and play Warhawk with a 56k connection, oh that’s right you probably can’t. And if you can’t join a game in five minutes it times out, if it doesn’t do that you can join one of the other 18,000 games that are going on during peak hours. Don’t be a fool and try to spread fud here , I don’t think it will work.

]]> By: Jeffrey leon http://loot-ninja.com/2007/09/27/the-rage-of-being-a-ps3-owner/#comment-16543 Jeffrey leon Fri, 28 Sep 2007 15:56:28 +0000 http://loot-ninja.com/2007/09/27/the-rage-of-being-a-ps3-owner/#comment-16543 Andrew why are you trying to clown on the game resistance's graphics? Its one of the best graphical games that released with the ps3 at launch. I'm tired of you crying about ps3 having bad servers, cuz i just think you're getting it twisted with 360 fanboys cuz they don't know nothing about ps3 servers and they say everything assumed. I think that 360 fanboys assume that ps3's online service sucks because they have to pay and ps3 owners don't...let me inform you.. I have had NO server problems ONCE since i've had the ps3! Ofcourse Madden 08 lagged online but now its doing great, besides, even xbox live has problems with its severs online hence the HALO 3 launch. And don't even talk about the ps3 losing exclusives cuz didn't 360 lose exclusives like HAZE???? AND UT 3????? which are going to be BIG titles for the holidays! Andrew why are you trying to clown on the game resistance’s graphics? Its one of the best graphical games that released with the ps3 at launch. I’m tired of you crying about ps3 having bad servers, cuz i just think you’re getting it twisted with 360 fanboys cuz they don’t know nothing about ps3 servers and they say everything assumed. I think that 360 fanboys assume that ps3’s online service sucks because they have to pay and ps3 owners don’t…let me inform you.. I have had NO server problems ONCE since i’ve had the ps3! Ofcourse Madden 08 lagged online but now its doing great, besides, even xbox live has problems with its severs online hence the HALO 3 launch. And don’t even talk about the ps3 losing exclusives cuz didn’t 360 lose exclusives like HAZE???? AND UT 3????? which are going to be BIG titles for the holidays!

]]> By: drunk pandas http://loot-ninja.com/2007/09/27/the-rage-of-being-a-ps3-owner/#comment-16541 drunk pandas Fri, 28 Sep 2007 15:27:51 +0000 http://loot-ninja.com/2007/09/27/the-rage-of-being-a-ps3-owner/#comment-16541 @Gunmetal - you know what? I would have to say by far, the people I've encountered on the PSN have been friendlier than those on Xbox Live. It haven't been called any racial slurs in any games I've played (and I haven't had any lag either) @Gunmetal - you know what? I would have to say by far, the people I’ve encountered on the PSN have been friendlier than those on Xbox Live. It haven’t been called any racial slurs in any games I’ve played (and I haven’t had any lag either)

]]> By: drunk pandas http://loot-ninja.com/2007/09/27/the-rage-of-being-a-ps3-owner/#comment-16540 drunk pandas Fri, 28 Sep 2007 15:26:38 +0000 http://loot-ninja.com/2007/09/27/the-rage-of-being-a-ps3-owner/#comment-16540 Seriously people. Punctuation isn't hard to use. I'm aiming this at the same person who can't figure out how to turn off the fucking caps lock Seriously people. Punctuation isn’t hard to use. I’m aiming this at the same person who can’t figure out how to turn off the fucking caps lock

]]>