Comments on: Video Comparison: 24fps vs. 60fps

By: Ultimax

Ultimax — Mon, 07 Apr 2008 17:29:36 +0000

Guys…
Unreal is fastest game ever… so when you will play this game on hi-skilled… 24fps is crazy …its shit! DM-TAM-ONS need more then 50 .. best is 80 fps. Just for info - this video is maked with framerate max 30fps, so how you can see differense between 34 and max30 fps ?
You should try this video on different game… unreal (coz is extremely fast and the best ) is worst choice for fps testing…

I play UT leagues 6yrs so i know what about im talking

By: robep3

robep3 — Thu, 13 Dec 2007 23:04:01 +0000

First of all your eyes DON’T SEE A THING!!!!! its your brain that sees the eyes focus light on light sensitive cells at the back of the eye which in turn send the info along the optic nerve to the brain that’s how hallucinogenic drugs work the PINK ELEPHANTS are not there the brain makes you see them.
I have seen movies with no motion blur on the frames shot in bright daylight that run at 24 frames per second and LOOK SMOOTH the reason for blur in movie frames is a combination of exposure /shutter speed if shutter speed slow an object
is moving fast blur will occur if very bright and shutter speed is fast you will have
very few blurred frames if you look at the the game shown the the 24 fps clip looks
like it stutters after watching the 60 fps clip but when run side by side they both
look smooth if a game runs at a rock steady 30 fps it will look smooth !!!!
As for people being able to detect 90-100hz is probably do to the light in the
room as here in uk for example mains electricty is 50hz so lights will flicker at a different rate from monitor so its noticable similar effect occurs in movies when
sometimes it looks like a cars wheels are rotating backwards as the car moves forwards its revs of wheels in relation to fps of film. Thats my thoughts re this
flame proof suit now on LOL.

Rob.

By: whatthehell

whatthehell — Thu, 13 Dec 2007 20:58:31 +0000

so where is 24fps with motion blur? I know UT2K4 doesnt support it but without it this video is stupid for saying “anyone who sees 24 fps as smooth is blind” because most games these days come with motion blur.

By: Ben

Ben — Thu, 13 Dec 2007 20:47:33 +0000

It’s easier to see with the ball because of the high level of constrast between the moving ball and the static background. There is a lot more visual “noise” in the gameplay video so it’s harder for your eyes to focus on individual pieces and track their movement.

By: chasegamez

chasegamez — Thu, 13 Dec 2007 20:39:30 +0000

i couldn’t see it when game play
but with the ball i seen it

By: myothercar

myothercar — Tue, 01 May 2007 02:05:21 +0000

LOL the human eye can only see 30fps? Where’d you pull that out from? AVERAGE human can detect 75fps- experienced PC users can detect about 90-100 fps or “HERTZ” in monitor refresh rate terms. I love the fluidity of high frames per second. Due to money issues, I usually put up with running computer games at low framerates like 30-40 fps. TV console games are capable of a maximum 60fps as that’s the fastest tv’s can update per second. I think LCD pc monitors are all a max 60fps (called the refresh rate). Decent crt monitors can do 90hz pretty easily.

But if you can’t tell the difference between 60 and 30 (watch the split-screen of the ball going left/right) then maybe you have a slow processor/codecs? I don’t know.

If you can’t tell the difference from these web videos, try this: Turn on your tv and watch a sports game/news broadcast, then watch a movie and tell me if you notice the difference.

By: SupTup

SupTup — Mon, 30 Apr 2007 10:46:42 +0000

Me neither… The human eye can only see 30 FPS so wtf… I don’t see any difference… The only problem is that a framedrop on 24 FPS will be much more noticeable!

By: fierce Scuba

fierce Scuba — Mon, 30 Apr 2007 03:00:46 +0000

maybe im retarded, but i didnt really see a difference.